Lithuania: Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2025, Lithuania's gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP) rose 0.53 percentage points on 2024 (from 22.41% to 22.94%).

Across the 29 yearly changes before that (1996 to 2024), the average change was +0.08 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 2.08 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 2.61 percentage points in 2006 and the biggest yearly fall was 8.21 percentage points in 2009. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2016 to 2025 the straight-line trend is upward, about 0.38 percentage points a year. A straight line explains 84% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2025, Lithuania had the 56th highest value of the 126 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Lithuania in the 2025 ranking

• Honduras — 52nd of 126: 23.33%
• Sierra Leone — 53rd of 126: 23.2%
• Russian Federation — 54th of 126: 23.09%
• Canada — 56th of 126: 22.9%
• Serbia — 57th of 126: 22.84%
• Philippines — 58th of 126: 22.74%

What this measures

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 31 values

Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP) in nearby economies

• Albania — 24.27% (2025)
• Armenia — 21.42% (2025)
• Austria — 23.53% (2025)
• Azerbaijan — 16.29% (2025)
• Belarus — 25.08% (2025)
• Belgium — 23.89% (2025)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina — 24.37% (2024)
• Bulgaria — 20.13% (2025)
• Croatia — 25.73% (2025)
• Cyprus — 20.03% (2025)

More economic policy & debt data for Lithuania

• Adjusted savings, education expenditure (% of GNI) — 3.88% (2021)
• Adjusted savings, mineral depletion (current US$) — US$0 (2021)
• Net financial flows, IBRD (NFL, current US$) — US$0 (2016)
• GDP (current LCU) — 84.26 billion (2025)
• GDP, linked series (current LCU) — 84.26 billion (2025)
• GDP (constant 2015 US$) — US$57.09 billion (2025)
• GDP (constant LCU) — 58.54 billion (2025)
• GDP, PPP (current international $) — 164.19 billion (2025)
• GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $) — 141.09 billion (2025)
• GDP per capita (current LCU) — 29,167 (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Lithuania's gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)?

22.94% in 2025, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1995?

It is up 2.71 percentage points from 20.24% in 1995. The highest value was 28.58% in 2007 and the lowest 17.09% in 2010.

How does Lithuania rank?

56th highest of 126 economies with data for 2025.

Is the latest change in gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP) unusual for Lithuania?

In 2025, Lithuania's gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP) rose 0.53 percentage points on 2024 (from 22.41% to 22.94%). Across the 29 yearly changes before that (1996 to 2024), the average change was +0.08 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 2.08 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NE.GDI.FTOT.ZS, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks; National Accounts data files, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Staff estimates, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.