Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2020, Saudi Arabia's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) rose 0 percentage points on 2019 (from 0.00104% to 0.0011%).

Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1990 to 2019), the average change was −0 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0 percentage points in 1986 and the biggest yearly fall was 0 percentage points in 1999. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2011 to 2020 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains 3% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

Closest to Saudi Arabia in the 2020 ranking

• Syrian Arab Republic — 1st of 5: 0.03%
• Bahrain — 3rd of 5: 0.000574%
• United Arab Emirates — 4th of 5: 0.000136%
• Türkiye — 5th of 5: 0%

What this measures

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.

Limitations: A positive net depletion figure for forest resources implies that the harvest rate exceeds the rate of natural growth; this is not the same as deforestation, which represents a change in land use. In principle, there should be an addition to savings in countries where growth exceeds harvest, but empirical estimates suggest that most of this net growth is in forested areas that cannot currently be exploited economically. Because the depletion estimates reflect only timber values, they ignore all the external and nontimber benefits associated with standing forests.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 51 values

Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) in nearby economies

• Afghanistan — 0.32% (2021)
• Algeria — 0% (2021)
• Bahrain — 0.000574% (2020)
• Djibouti — 0.28% (2021)
• Egypt, Arab Rep. — 0.11% (2021)
• Iran, Islamic Rep. — 0% (2021)
• Iraq — 0.00327% (2021)
• Israel — 0% (2021)
• Jordan — 0.02% (2021)
• Kuwait

More economic policy & debt data for Saudi Arabia

• Total reserves, including gold (current US$) — US$505.16 billion (2025)
• Total reserves, excluding gold (current US$) — US$459.8 billion (2025)
• GDP (current US$) — US$1.28 trillion (2025)
• GDP (current LCU) — 4.79 trillion (2025)
• GDP (constant 2015 US$) — US$926.78 billion (2025)
• GDP (constant LCU) — 4.9 trillion (2025)
• GDP per capita (current US$) — US$34,537 (2025)
• GDP per capita (current LCU) — 129,512 (2025)
• GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$) — US$25,066 (2025)
• GDP per capita (constant LCU) — 132,580 (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Saudi Arabia's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI)?

0.0011% in 2020, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1970?

It is down 0.00042 percentage points from 0.00152% in 1970. The highest value was 0.00189% in 1998 and the lowest 0.000205% in 1976.

Is the latest change in adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) unusual for Saudi Arabia?

In 2020, Saudi Arabia's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) rose 0 percentage points on 2019 (from 0.00104% to 0.0011%). Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1990 to 2019), the average change was −0 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Where does this data come from?

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NY.ADJ.DFOR.GN.ZS, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.