Poland's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) was 0% in 2021, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is unchanged since 2011.
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 0% | 2021 |
| Five years earlier | 0% | 2016 |
| Ten years earlier | 0% | 2011 |
| Highest | 0% | 1990 |
| Lowest | 0% | 1990 |
| Average since 2012 | 0% | 2012–2021 |
| First recorded | 0% | 1990 |
What the numbers say
From 2012 to 2021 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains less than 1% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
How it compares
In 2021, Poland had the 99th highest value of the 168 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.
Closest to Poland in the 2021 ranking
- Norway — 147th of 168: 0%
- Panama — 148th of 168: 0%
- Philippines — 149th of 168: 0%
- Romania — 151st of 168: 0%
- Russian Federation — 152nd of 168: 0%
- Senegal — 153rd of 168: 0%
What this measures
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.
Limitations: A positive net depletion figure for forest resources implies that the harvest rate exceeds the rate of natural growth; this is not the same as deforestation, which represents a change in land use. In principle, there should be an addition to savings in countries where growth exceeds harvest, but empirical estimates suggest that most of this net growth is in forested areas that cannot currently be exploited economically. Because the depletion estimates reflect only timber values, they ignore all the external and nontimber benefits associated with standing forests.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.
All 32 values
| Year | Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2011 |
Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI) in nearby economies
- Albania — 0.14% (2021)
- Armenia — 0.28% (2021)
- Austria — 0.03% (2021)
- Azerbaijan — 0% (2021)
- Belarus — 0% (2021)
- Belgium — 0.00744% (2021)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina — 0% (2021)
- Bulgaria — 0% (2021)
- Croatia — 0.15% (2021)
- Cyprus
More economic policy & debt data for Poland
- Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing) — 21.83% (2023)
- Other manufacturing (% of value added in manufacturing) — 51.56% (2023)
- Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing) — 2.17% (2023)
- Food, beverages and tobacco (% of value added in manufacturing) — 18.5% (2023)
- Chemicals (% of value added in manufacturing) — 5.95% (2023)
- Adjusted savings, education expenditure (% of GNI) — 4.53% (2021)
- Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) — US$0 (2021)
- Adjusted savings, mineral depletion (current US$) — US$1.13 billion (2021)
- Adjusted savings, energy depletion (current US$)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Poland's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (% of GNI)?
- 0% in 2021, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 1990?
- It is unchanged since 1990. The highest value was 0% in 1990 and the lowest 0% in 1990.
- How does Poland rank?
- 99th highest of 168 economies with data for 2021.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium, World Bank (WB).
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NY.ADJ.DFOR.GN.ZS, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in