Late-demographic dividend: School enrollment, primary, female (% net)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2015, Late-demographic dividend's school enrollment, primary, female (% net) rose 0.06 percentage points on 2014 (from 96.06% to 96.13%).

Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1987 to 2014), the average change was +0.38 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 1.03 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 3.47 percentage points in 1987 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.86 percentage points in 1995. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2006 to 2015 the straight-line trend is upward, about 0.11 percentage points a year. A straight line explains 55% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

See how every economy compares in the full ranking.

What this measures

Net enrollment rate is the ratio of children of official school age who are enrolled in school to the population of the corresponding official school age. Primary education provides children with basic reading, writing, and mathematics skills along with an elementary understanding of such subjects as history, geography, natural science, social science, art, and music.

Limitations: Enrollment indicators are based on annual school surveys, but do not necessarily reflect actual attendance or dropout rates during the year. Also, the length of education differs across countries and can influence enrollment rates, although the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) tries to minimize the difference. For example, a shorter duration for primary education tends to increase the rate; a longer one to decrease it (in part because older children are more at risk of dropping out). Moreover, age at enrollment may be inaccurately estimated or misstated, especially in communities where registration of births is not strictly enforced.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 30 values

School enrollment, primary, female (% net) in nearby economies

• Bahrain — 95.85% (2018)
• Djibouti — 66.48% (2019)
• Jordan — 80.18% (2018)
• Kuwait — 86.86% (2018)
• Morocco — 96.96% (2017)
• Pakistan — 61.57% (2018)
• Qatar — 95.17% (2018)
• West Bank and Gaza — 95.05% (2018)

More education data for Late-demographic dividend

• Primary education, duration (years) — 5 (2025)
• Secondary education, duration (years) — 7 (2025)
• Primary education, pupils — 173.78 million (2024)
• School enrollment, primary (% gross) — 100.27% (2024)
• Primary education, teachers — 10.38 million (2024)
• Secondary education, pupils — 177.18 million (2024)
• School enrollment, secondary (% gross) — 94.17% (2024)
• Secondary education, teachers — 13.43 million (2024)
• School enrollment, tertiary (% gross) — 69.36% (2024)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Late-demographic dividend's school enrollment, primary, female (% net)?

96.13% in 2015, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1986?

It is up 10.77 percentage points from 85.36% in 1986. The highest value was 96.13% in 2015 and the lowest 85.36% in 1986.

Is the latest change in school enrollment, primary, female (% net) unusual for Late-demographic dividend?

In 2015, Late-demographic dividend's school enrollment, primary, female (% net) rose 0.06 percentage points on 2014 (from 96.06% to 96.13%). Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1987 to 2014), the average change was +0.38 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 1.03 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator SE.PRM.NENR.FE, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), uri: http://uis.unesco.org/, publisher: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.