Kazakhstan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2024, Kazakhstan's methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) fell 4.9% on 2023 (from 0.07 to 0.07).

Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1994 to 2023), the average change was +3% and a typical year strayed about 12.9% from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.6 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 42.6% in 1984 and the biggest yearly fall was 36.4% in 1982. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2015 to 2024 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains 9% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2024, Kazakhstan had the 24th highest value of the 94 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Kazakhstan in the 2024 ranking

• Singapore — 21st of 94: 0.08
• Mexico — 22nd of 94: 0.07
• New Zealand — 23rd of 94: 0.07
• Thailand — 25th of 94: 0.06
• Equatorial Guinea — 26th of 94: 0.06
• United Kingdom — 27th of 94: 0.05

What this measures

A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.A.1 Cement production, 2.A.2 Lime production, 2.A.3 Glass Production, 2.A.4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates, 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.D Non-Energy Products from Fuels and Solvent Use, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use and 5.A Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).

Limitations: Global GHG emissions are currently not directly measurable, but approaches for their estimation exist, and numerous sources exist to supply data for this indicator. Reputable scientific organizations produce these data for use for research, policy analysis, climate negotiations, and broader public communications. The estimated accuracy from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes are quite high, as quantities of fossil fuels and other emissive materials (such as cement and steel) produced are well known. For these sectors, emissions estimates are roughly accurate to within 10% when aggregated to the global level and between 4% and 35% at the country level (Crippa et al., 2023).

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a sum.

All 55 values

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) in nearby economies

• Albania — 0.0022 (2024)
• Armenia — 0.0003 (2024)
• Austria — 0.02 (2024)
• Azerbaijan — 0.0005 (2024)
• Belarus — 0.006 (2024)
• Belgium — 0.05 (2024)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina — 0.0013 (2024)
• Bulgaria — 0.0061 (2024)
• Croatia — 0.0019 (2024)

More environment data for Kazakhstan

• Population in largest city — 2.04 million (2025)
• Population in the largest city (% of urban population) — 15.7% (2025)
• Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million — 3.39 million (2025)
• Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) — 16.29% (2025)
• Rural population — 7.84 million (2025)
• Rural population (% of total population) — 37.61% (2025)
• Urban population — 13 million (2025)
• Urban population (% of total population) — 62.39% (2025)
• Rural population growth (annual %) — 0.38% (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Kazakhstan's methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)?

0.07 in 2024, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1970?

It is down 34.02% from 0.1 in 1970 (0.77% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 0.12 in 1973 and the lowest 0.02 in 1996.

How does Kazakhstan rank?

24th highest of 94 economies with data for 2024.

Is the latest change in methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) unusual for Kazakhstan?

In 2024, Kazakhstan's methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) fell 4.9% on 2023 (from 0.07 to 0.07). Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1994 to 2023), the average change was +3% and a typical year strayed about 12.9% from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.6 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator EN.GHG.CH4.IP.MT.CE.AR5, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, uri: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset_ghg2024, publisher: JRC European Commission, date published: 2024; International Energy Agency (IEA), uri: https://edgar.j… Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.