Kazakhstan: Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2021, Kazakhstan's energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP) fell 0.3% on 2020 (from 5.83 to 5.81).

Across the 20 yearly changes before that (2001 to 2020), the average change was −2.1% and a typical year strayed about 9.8% from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 15.9% in 2016 and the biggest yearly fall was 23.4% in 2014. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2012 to 2021 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.22 a year. A straight line explains 44% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2021, Kazakhstan had the 32nd highest value of the 85 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Kazakhstan in the 2021 ranking

• Belarus — 29th of 85: 6.18
• Haiti — 30th of 85: 5.88
• South Sudan — 31st of 85: 5.88
• Saudi Arabia — 33rd of 85: 5.81
• Nepal — 34th of 85: 5.63
• Algeria — 35th of 85: 5.61

What this measures

Energy intensity level of primary energy is the ratio between energy supply and gross domestic product measured at purchasing power parity. Energy intensity is an indication of how much energy is used to produce one unit of economic output. Lower ratio indicates that less energy is used to produce one unit of output.

Limitations: Energy intensity level is only an imperfect proxy to energy efficiency indicator and it can be affected by a number of factors not necessarily linked to pure efficiency such as climate.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 22 values

Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP) in nearby economies

• Albania — 2.06 (2022)
• Andorra — 1.81 (2022)
• Armenia — 3.91 (2021)
• Austria — 2.55 (2022)
• Azerbaijan — 4.4 (2022)
• Belarus — 6.18 (2021)
• Belgium — 3.4 (2022)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina — 5.53 (2022)
• Bulgaria — 4.72 (2022)

More environment data for Kazakhstan

• Population in largest city — 2.04 million (2025)
• Population in the largest city (% of urban population) — 15.7% (2025)
• Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million — 3.39 million (2025)
• Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) — 16.29% (2025)
• Rural population — 7.84 million (2025)
• Rural population (% of total population) — 37.61% (2025)
• Urban population — 13 million (2025)
• Urban population (% of total population) — 62.39% (2025)
• Rural population growth (annual %) — 0.38% (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Kazakhstan's energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)?

5.81 in 2021, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 2000?

It is down 40.35% from 9.74 in 2000 (2.43% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 9.74 in 2000 and the lowest 5.36 in 2015.

How does Kazakhstan rank?

32nd highest of 85 economies with data for 2021.

Is the latest change in energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP) unusual for Kazakhstan?

In 2021, Kazakhstan's energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP) fell 0.3% on 2020 (from 5.83 to 5.81). Across the 20 yearly changes before that (2001 to 2020), the average change was −2.1% and a typical year strayed about 9.8% from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator EG.EGY.PRIM.PP.KD, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO); International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), note: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report; United Nations (UN), note: Tracking SD… Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.