Public Sector · Honduras
Honduras: CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Yearly data from 2005 to 2025, from the World Bank.
Public Sector · Honduras
Yearly data from 2005 to 2025, from the World Bank.
Honduras's CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) was 3.33 in 2025, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is down 9.09% from 3.67 in 2015 (0.95% a year on average, compounded).
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 3.33 | 2025 |
| Five years earlier | 3.33 | 2020 |
| Ten years earlier | 3.67 | 2015 |
| Highest | 4.33 | 2007 |
| Lowest | 3.33 | 2019 |
| Average since 2016 | 3.37 | 2016–2025 |
| First recorded | 4 | 2005 |
Over five years it is down 0.00001% from 3.33 in 2020. Since 2005 it is down 16.67% from 4 in 2005 (0.91% a year on average, compounded).
In 2025, Honduras' CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) did not change 0% on 2024 (from 3.33 to 3.33).
Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was −0.9% and a typical year strayed about 3.8% from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 4.5% in 2011 and the biggest yearly fall was 12.3% in 2008. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2016 to 2025 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.02 a year. A straight line explains 48% of the movement over 10 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
In 2025, Honduras had the 25th highest value of the 72 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Honduras | 3.33 | 2025 |
| World | 3.15 | 2025 |
| Latin America & Caribbean | 3.25 | 2025 |
| Lower middle income | 3.28 | 2025 |
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.
Limitations: The scores depend on the level of performance each year assessed against the criteria, rather than on changes in performance compared to the previous year. The ratings depend on actual policies and performance, rather than on promises or intentions. In some cases, measures such as the passage of specific legislation can represent an important action that deserves consideration. However, the way such actions should be factored into the ratings is carefully assessed, because in the end, it is the implementation of legislation that determines the extent of its impact.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a unweighted average.
| Year | CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.33 |
| 2024 | 3.33 |
| 2023 | 3.33 |
| 2022 | 3.33 |
| 2021 | 3.33 |
| 2020 | 3.33 |
| 2019 | 3.33 |
| 2018 | 3.33 |
| 2017 | 3.5 |
| 2016 | 3.5 |
| 2015 | 3.67 |
| 2014 | 3.67 |
| 2013 | 3.67 |
| 2012 | 3.67 |
| 2011 | 3.83 |
| 2010 | 3.67 |
| 2009 | 3.67 |
| 2008 | 3.8 |
| 2007 | 4.33 |
| 2006 | 4.17 |
| 2005 | 4 |
Every indicator for Honduras is on the Honduras data page.
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.CPA.STRC.XQ, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/int/search/dataset/0038988 Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in