Congo, Dem. Rep.'s CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) was 4 in 2025, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is up 14.29% from 3.5 in 2015 (1.34% a year on average, compounded).
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 4 | 2025 |
| Five years earlier | 3 | 2020 |
| Ten years earlier | 3.5 | 2015 |
| Highest | 4 | 2022 |
| Lowest | 2.5 | 2017 |
| Average since 2016 | 3.4 | 2016–2025 |
| First recorded | 3.5 | 2005 |
What the numbers say
In 2025, Congo, Dem. Rep.'s CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) did not change 0 on 2024 (from 4 to 4).
Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was +0.03 and a typical year strayed about 0.26 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.5 in 2018 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.5 in 2016. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2016 to 2025 the straight-line trend is upward, about 0.17 a year. A straight line explains 82% of the movement over 10 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
How it compares
In 2025, Congo, Dem. Rep. had the 9th highest value of the 72 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Congo, Dem. Rep. | 4 | 2025 |
| World | 3.39 | 2025 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 3.46 | 2025 |
| Low income | 3.06 | 2025 |
Closest to Congo, Dem. Rep. in the 2025 ranking
- Burkina Faso — 10th of 72: 4
- Cabo Verde — 11th of 72: 4
- Cambodia — 12th of 72: 4
- Côte d'Ivoire — 14th of 72: 4
- Dominica — 15th of 72: 4
- Guinea — 16th of 72: 4
What this measures
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.
Limitations: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a unweighted average.
All 21 values
| Year | CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 4 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2023 | 4 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2021 | 3.5 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2018 | 3 |
| 2017 | 2.5 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2015 |
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in nearby economies
- Benin — 4 (2025)
- Burkina Faso — 4 (2025)
- Burundi — 3 (2025)
- Cabo Verde — 4 (2025)
- Cameroon — 3.5 (2025)
- Central African Republic — 3.5 (2025)
- Chad — 3.5 (2025)
- Comoros — 3 (2025)
- Congo, Rep. — 3.5 (2025)
- Côte d'Ivoire
More public sector data for Congo, Dem. Rep.
- Military expenditure (current USD) — 1.23 billion (2025)
- Military expenditure (current LCU) — 3.32 trillion (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) — 44 million (2025)
- Military expenditure (% of GDP) — 1.38% (2025)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (current LCU) — 8.54 trillion (2022)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (% of GDP) — 6.04% (2022)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (current LCU) — -2.92 trillion (2022)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (% of GDP) — -2.07% (2022)
- Grants and other revenue (current LCU) — 8.14 trillion (2022)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Congo, Dem. Rep.'s CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)?
- 4 in 2025, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 2005?
- It is up 14.29% from 3.5 in 2005 (0.67% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 4 in 2022 and the lowest 2.5 in 2017.
- How does Congo, Dem. Rep. rank?
- 9th highest of 72 economies with data for 2025.
- Is the latest change in CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) unusual for Congo, Dem. Rep.?
- In 2025, Congo, Dem. Rep.'s CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) did not change 0 on 2024 (from 4 to 4). Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was +0.03 and a typical year strayed about 0.26 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.CPA.MACR.XQ, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/int/search/dataset/0038988 Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in