Chad: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2024, Chad's statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) did not change 0 on 2023 (from 63.4 to 63.4).

Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2005 to 2023), the average change was +2.28 and a typical year strayed about 6.78 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 20 in 2015 and the biggest yearly fall was 6.6 in 2020. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2015 to 2024 the straight-line trend is upward, about 1.39 a year. A straight line explains 42% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2024, Chad had the 146th highest value of the 217 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Chad in the 2024 ranking

• Afghanistan — 143rd of 217: 66.6
• Guinea — 144th of 217: 66.6
• Iran, Islamic Rep. — 145th of 217: 66.6
• Algeria — 147th of 217: 60
• Andorra — 148th of 217: 60
• Angola — 149th of 217: 60

What this measures

The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.

Limitations: Currently, the dashboard only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 21 values

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) in nearby economies

• Angola — 60 (2024)
• Benin — 90 (2024)
• Botswana — 50 (2024)
• Burkina Faso — 90 (2024)
• Burundi — 50 (2024)
• Cabo Verde — 80 (2024)
• Cameroon — 70 (2024)
• Central African Republic — 50 (2024)

More public sector data for Chad

• Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) — 4 million (2025)
• Military expenditure (current USD) — 648.81 million (2025)
• Military expenditure (current LCU) — 377.27 billion (2025)
• Military expenditure (% of GDP) — 3.19% (2025)
• Armed forces personnel, total — 45,000 (2020)
• Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force) — 0.85% (2020)
• Military expenditure (% of general government expenditure) — 15.53% (2025)
• Battle-related deaths (number of people) — 69 (2024)
• CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) — 2.5 (2025)
• CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Chad's statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)?

63.4 in 2024, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 2004?

It is up 217% from 20 in 2004 (5.94% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 63.4 in 2022 and the lowest 20 in 2004.

How does Chad rank?

146th highest of 217 economies with data for 2024.

Is the latest change in statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) unusual for Chad?

In 2024, Chad's statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) did not change 0 on 2023 (from 63.4 to 63.4). Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2005 to 2023), the average change was +2.28 and a typical year strayed about 6.78 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.SPI.PIL1, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), uri: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.