Zimbabwe's aquaculture production (metric tons) was 8,224 in 2024, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is down 61.56% from 21,394 in 2014 (9.12% a year on average, compounded).
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 8,224 | 2024 |
| Five years earlier | 20,356 | 2019 |
| Ten years earlier | 21,394 | 2014 |
| Highest | 21,501 | 2016 |
| Lowest | 0 | 1960 |
| Average since 2015 | 14,822 | 2015–2024 |
| First recorded | 0 | 1960 |
What the numbers say
In 2024, Zimbabwe's aquaculture production (metric tons) rose 1,070 on 2023 (from 7,154 to 8,224).
Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1994 to 2023), the average change was +234.12 and a typical year strayed about 3,742 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 9,800 in 2011 and the biggest yearly fall was 16,219 in 2021. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2015 to 2024 the straight-line trend is downward, about 1,895 a year. A straight line explains 67% of the movement over 10 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
How it compares
In 2024, Zimbabwe had the 92nd highest value of the 215 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Zimbabwe | 8,224 | 2024 |
| World | 141.41 million | 2024 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 904,661 | 2024 |
| Lower middle income | 19.78 million | 2024 |
Closest to Zimbabwe in the 2024 ranking
- Belarus — 89th of 215: 9,022
- South Africa — 90th of 215: 8,439
- Rwanda — 91st of 215: 8,392
- Guinea — 93rd of 215: 8,214
- Albania — 94th of 215: 7,378
- Mozambique — 95th of 215: 7,170
What this measures
Aquaculture is understood to mean the farming of aquatic organisms including fish, molluscs, crustaceans and aquatic plants. Aquaculture production specifically refers to output from aquaculture activities, which are designated for final harvest for consumption.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a sum.
All 65 values
| Year | Aquaculture production (metric tons) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 8,224 |
| 2023 | 7,154 |
| 2022 | 6,807 |
| 2021 | 5,058 |
| 2020 | 21,276 |
| 2019 | 20,356 |
| 2018 | 18,759 |
| 2017 | 17,909 |
| 2016 | 21,501 |
| 2015 | 21,178 |
| 2014 |
Aquaculture production (metric tons) in nearby economies
- Angola — 21,788 (2024)
- Benin — 2,460 (2024)
- Botswana — 156 (2024)
- Burkina Faso — 1,293 (2024)
- Burundi — 645 (2024)
- Cabo Verde — 40 (2024)
- Cameroon — 14,100 (2024)
- Central African Republic — 410 (2024)
- Chad — 115 (2024)
- Comoros — 0 (2024)
- Congo, Dem. Rep.
More environment data for Zimbabwe
- Population in largest city — 1.63 million (2025)
- Population in the largest city (% of urban population) — 23.79% (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million — 1.63 million (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) — 9.63% (2025)
- Rural population — 10.09 million (2025)
- Rural population (% of total population) — 59.5% (2025)
- Urban population — 6.86 million (2025)
- Urban population (% of total population) — 40.5% (2025)
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons) — 104,906 (2024)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Zimbabwe's aquaculture production (metric tons)?
- 8,224 in 2024, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How does Zimbabwe rank?
- 92nd highest of 215 economies with data for 2024.
- Is the latest change in aquaculture production (metric tons) unusual for Zimbabwe?
- In 2024, Zimbabwe's aquaculture production (metric tons) rose 1,070 on 2023 (from 7,154 to 8,224). Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1994 to 2023), the average change was +234.12 and a typical year strayed about 3,742 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Food and Agriculture Organization., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator ER.FSH.AQUA.MT, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Food and Agriculture Organization., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in