Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$)

Key figures

Over five years it is up 626.51% from US$231,896 in 2018 (48.68% a year on average, compounded). Since 1989 it is down 5.35% from US$1.78 million in 1989 (0.16% a year on average, compounded). The World Bank has no value for 6 of the years in between; the chart leaves those gaps open rather than joining across them.

What the numbers say

In 2023, Namibia's net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) fell US$317,515 on 2022 (from US$2 million to US$1.68 million).

Across the 25 yearly changes before that (1990 to 2022), the average change was +US$12,914 and a typical year strayed about US$1.56 million from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was US$4.51 million in 1992 and the biggest yearly fall was US$4.03 million in 1994. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2023, Namibia had the 54th highest value of the 83 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Namibia in the 2023 ranking

• Congo, Rep. — 51st of 83: US$1.75 million
• Guatemala — 52nd of 83: US$1.74 million
• Bolivia — 53rd of 83: US$1.73 million
• Ghana — 55th of 83: US$1.64 million
• Nepal — 56th of 83: US$1.41 million
• Cuba — 57th of 83: US$1.39 million

What this measures

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a sum.

All 29 values

Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) in nearby economies

• Angola — US$2.02 million (2023)
• Benin — US$444,053 (2023)
• Burkina Faso — US$8.57 million (2023)
• Burundi — US$5.41 million (2023)
• Cabo Verde — US$11,373 (2023)
• Cameroon — US$5.86 million (2023)
• Central African Republic — US$12.54 million (2023)
• Chad — US$14.01 million (2023)
• Congo, Dem. Rep. — US$12.39 million (2023)
• Congo, Rep. — US$1.75 million (2023)
• Côte d'Ivoire — US$2 million (2023)
• Eswatini — US$1.77 million (2023)
• Ethiopia — US$19.25 million (2023)
• Gambia, The — US$495,926 (2023)
• Ghana — US$1.64 million (2023)

More economic policy & debt data for Namibia

• Adjusted savings, education expenditure (% of GNI) — 8.92% (2021)
• Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) — US$106.2 million (2021)
• Adjusted savings, mineral depletion (current US$) — US$262.77 million (2021)
• General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) — US$3.36 billion (2025)
• General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) — 60.11 billion (2025)
• General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) — US$3.51 billion (2025)
• General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) — 45.2 billion (2025)
• General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP) — 22.28% (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (current US$) — US$11.8 billion (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (current LCU) — 211.15 billion (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) — US$11.31 billion (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) — 145.64 billion (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$) — US$3,656 (2025)
• Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (% of GDP) — 78.27% (2025)
• Final consumption expenditure (current US$) — US$15.16 billion (2025)

Every indicator for Namibia is on the Namibia data page.

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Namibia's net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$)?

US$1.68 million in 2023, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1989?

It is down 5.35% from US$1.78 million in 1989 (0.16% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was US$7.02 million in 1992 and the lowest −US$40,000 in 1994.

How does Namibia rank?

54th highest of 83 economies with data for 2023.

Is the latest change in net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) unusual for Namibia?

In 2023, Namibia's net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$) fell US$317,515 on 2022 (from US$2 million to US$1.68 million). Across the 25 yearly changes before that (1990 to 2022), the average change was +US$12,914 and a typical year strayed about US$1.56 million from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.2 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), uri: https://stats.oecd.org/; Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), uri: https://stats.oecd.org/; Developmen….

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator DT.NFL.WFPG.CD, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), uri: https://stats.oecd.org/; Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), uri: https://stats.oecd.org/; Developmen… Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.