Mongolia: CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2019, Mongolia's CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) did not change 0 on 2018 (from 3.5 to 3.5).

Across the 13 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2018), the average change was −0.04 and a typical year strayed about 0.32 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.5 in 2009 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.5 in 2007. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2010 to 2019 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains less than 1% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

See how every economy compares in the full ranking.

Closest to Mongolia in the 2019 ranking

• Moldova — 1st of 2: 4.5

What this measures

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.

Limitations: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a unweighted average.

All 15 values

CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in nearby economies

• Cambodia — 4 (2025)
• Kiribati — 3 (2025)
• Lao PDR — 3.5 (2025)
• Marshall Islands — 3 (2025)
• Micronesia, Fed. Sts. — 3 (2025)
• Myanmar — 1.5 (2025)
• Papua New Guinea — 2.5 (2025)
• Samoa — 4.5 (2025)
• Solomon Islands — 3 (2025)
• Timor-Leste

More public sector data for Mongolia

• Military expenditure (current LCU) — 784.57 billion (2025)
• Military expenditure (% of GDP) — 0.88% (2025)
• Military expenditure (% of general government expenditure) — 2.47% (2025)
• Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) — 3 million (2022)
• Military expenditure (current USD) — 221.32 million (2025)
• Armed forces personnel, total — 18,000 (2020)
• Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU) — 1.88 trillion (2024)
• Net acquisition of financial assets (% of GDP) — 2.34% (2024)
• Net incurrence of liabilities, total (current LCU) — 420.26 billion (2024)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Mongolia's CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)?

3.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 2005?

It is down 12.5% from 4 in 2005 (0.95% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 4 in 2005 and the lowest 3 in 2008.

Is the latest change in CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) unusual for Mongolia?

In 2019, Mongolia's CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) did not change 0 on 2018 (from 3.5 to 3.5). Across the 13 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2018), the average change was −0.04 and a typical year strayed about 0.32 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/int/search/dataset/0038988.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.CPA.MACR.XQ, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/int/search/dataset/0038988 Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.