Lithuania: Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2021, Lithuania's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) did not change US$0 on 2020 (from US$0 to US$0).

Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1993 to 2020), the average change was −US$1.95 million and a typical year strayed about US$14.47 million from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was US$49.48 million in 1995 and the biggest yearly fall was US$39.32 million in 2001. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2012 to 2021 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains less than 1% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2021, Lithuania had the 112th highest value of the 183 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Lithuania in the 2021 ranking

• Kyrgyz Republic — 146th of 183: US$0
• Latvia — 147th of 183: US$0
• Lebanon — 148th of 183: US$0
• Mexico — 150th of 183: US$0
• Moldova — 151st of 183: US$0
• Mongolia — 152nd of 183: US$0

What this measures

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.

All 30 values

Adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) in nearby economies

• Albania — US$25.28 million (2021)
• Armenia — US$37.11 million (2021)
• Austria — US$140.28 million (2021)
• Azerbaijan — US$0 (2021)
• Belarus — US$0 (2021)
• Belgium — US$44.61 million (2021)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina — US$0 (2021)
• Bulgaria — US$0 (2021)
• Croatia — US$104.98 million (2021)
• Cyprus

More economic policy & debt data for Lithuania

• Adjusted savings, education expenditure (% of GNI) — 3.88% (2021)
• Adjusted savings, mineral depletion (current US$) — US$0 (2021)
• Net financial flows, IBRD (NFL, current US$) — US$0 (2016)
• GDP (current LCU) — 84.26 billion (2025)
• GDP, linked series (current LCU) — 84.26 billion (2025)
• GDP (constant 2015 US$) — US$57.09 billion (2025)
• GDP (constant LCU) — 58.54 billion (2025)
• GDP, PPP (current international $) — 164.19 billion (2025)
• GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $) — 141.09 billion (2025)
• GDP per capita (current LCU) — 29,167 (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Lithuania's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$)?

US$0 in 2021, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1992?

It is down 100% from US$54.68 million in 1992. The highest value was US$106.37 million in 1995 and the lowest US$0 in 2003.

How does Lithuania rank?

112th highest of 183 economies with data for 2021.

Is the latest change in adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) unusual for Lithuania?

In 2021, Lithuania's adjusted savings, net forest depletion (current US$) did not change US$0 on 2020 (from US$0 to US$0). Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1993 to 2020), the average change was −US$1.95 million and a typical year strayed about US$14.47 million from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NY.ADJ.DFOR.CD, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.