Liechtenstein's adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) was 0.1% in 2019, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is down 0.05 percentage points from 0.15% in 2009.
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 0.1% | 2019 |
| Five years earlier | 0.1% | 2014 |
| Ten years earlier | 0.15% | 2009 |
| Highest | 0.19% | 1993 |
| Lowest | 0.08% | 2018 |
| Average since 2010 | 0.11% | 2010–2019 |
| First recorded | 0.17% | 1990 |
What the numbers say
In 2019, Liechtenstein's adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) rose 0.02 percentage points on 2018 (from 0.08% to 0.1%).
Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1991 to 2018), the average change was −0 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0.02 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.04 percentage points in 2012 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.04 percentage points in 2007. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2010 to 2019 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.00576 percentage points a year. A straight line explains 61% of the movement over 10 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
Closest to Liechtenstein in the 2019 ranking
- Turkmenistan — 1st of 4: 6.82%
- Kuwait — 2nd of 4: 2.45%
- Cuba — 3rd of 4: 1.04%
What this measures
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.
All 30 values
| Year | Adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.0976 |
| 2018 | 0.0793 |
| 2017 | 0.0887 |
| 2016 | 0.09 |
| 2015 | 0.1078 |
| 2014 | 0.1002 |
| 2013 | 0.1202 |
| 2012 | 0.155 |
| 2011 | 0.1185 |
| 2010 | 0.1267 |
| 2009 |
Adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) in nearby economies
- Albania — 1.24% (2021)
- Armenia — 1.95% (2021)
- Austria — 0.57% (2021)
- Azerbaijan — 3.14% (2021)
- Belarus — 3.93% (2021)
- Belgium — 0.67% (2021)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina — 4.11% (2021)
- Bulgaria — 2.08% (2021)
- Croatia — 1.04% (2021)
- Cyprus
More economic policy & debt data for Liechtenstein
- GDP (current US$) — US$8.91 billion (2024)
- GDP (current LCU) — 7.84 billion (2024)
- GDP per capita (current US$) — US$220,167 (2024)
- GDP per capita (current LCU) — 193,844 (2024)
- GNI (current US$) — US$7.76 billion (2023)
- GNI (current LCU) — 6.97 billion (2023)
- GNI per capita (current LCU) — 174,971 (2023)
- Net primary income (net income from abroad) (current US$) — −US$479.81 million (2023)
- Net primary income (net income from abroad) (current LCU) — -431.1 million (2023)
- Adjusted savings, education expenditure (% of GNI)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Liechtenstein's adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)?
- 0.1% in 2019, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 1990?
- It is down 0.08 percentage points from 0.17% in 1990. The highest value was 0.19% in 1993 and the lowest 0.08% in 2018.
- Is the latest change in adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) unusual for Liechtenstein?
- In 2019, Liechtenstein's adjusted savings, carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI) rose 0.02 percentage points on 2018 (from 0.08% to 0.1%). Across the 28 yearly changes before that (1991 to 2018), the average change was −0 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0.02 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.2 standard deviations above that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.
- Where does this data come from?
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NY.ADJ.DCO2.GN.ZS, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in