IDA total: CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2025, IDA total's CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high) fell 0.03 on 2024 (from 3.7 to 3.67).

Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was +0.000987 and a typical year strayed about 0.03 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.07 in 2009 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.03 in 2019. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2016 to 2025 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.00837 a year. A straight line explains 78% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

See how every economy compares in the full ranking.

What this measures

Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.

Limitations: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a unweighted average.

All 21 values

CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high) in nearby economies

• Afghanistan — 3 (2025)
• Djibouti — 3.5 (2025)
• Pakistan — 4 (2025)
• Yemen, Rep. — 2.5 (2025)

More public sector data for IDA total

• Military expenditure (% of GDP) — 1.38% (2025)
• Military expenditure (current USD) — 37.69 billion (2025)
• Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) — 1.43 billion (2025)
• Armed forces personnel, total — 4.52 million (2020)
• Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force) — 0.67% (2020)
• CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) — 2.96 (2025)
• CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high) — 3.12 (2025)
• CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) — 3.17 (2025)
• CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is IDA total's CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high)?

3.67 in 2025, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 2005?

It is down 0.26% from 3.68 in 2005. The highest value was 3.79 in 2014 and the lowest 3.67 in 2025.

Is the latest change in CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high) unusual for IDA total?

In 2025, IDA total's CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high) fell 0.03 on 2024 (from 3.7 to 3.67). Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was +0.000987 and a typical year strayed about 0.03 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: http://www.worldbank.org/ida.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.CPA.TRAD.XQ, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: http://www.worldbank.org/ida Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.