Guam's intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) was 4.33 in 2019, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is up 43.78% from 3.01 in 2009 (3.7% a year on average, compounded).
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 4.33 | 2019 |
| Ten years earlier | 3.01 | 2009 |
| Highest | 6.67 | 2006 |
| Lowest | 0.6 | 2008 |
| Average since 2010 | 2.84 | 2010–2019 |
| First recorded | 1.25 | 2000 |
Since 2000 it is up 246.23% from 1.25 in 2000 (6.75% a year on average, compounded). The World Bank has no value for 7 of the years in between; the chart leaves those gaps open rather than joining across them.
What the numbers say
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 3.71 in 2001 and the biggest yearly fall was 6.07 in 2007. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
How it compares
See how every economy compares in the full ranking.
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Guam | 4.33 | 2019 |
| World | 5.2 | 2023 |
| East Asia & Pacific | 0.8 | 2023 |
| High income | 2.9 | 2023 |
Closest to Guam in the 2019 ranking
What this measures
An intentional homicide is defined as an unlawful death inflicted upon a person with the intent to cause death or serious injury.
Limitations: Statistics reported to the United Nations in the context of its various surveys on crime levels and criminal justice trends are incidents of victimization that have been reported to the authorities in any given country. That means that this data is subject to the problems of accuracy of all official crime data. The survey results provide an overview of trends and interrelationships between various parts of the criminal justice system to promote informed decision-making in administration, nationally and internationally. The degree to which different societies apportion the level of culpability to acts resulting in death is also subject to variation.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a aggregate values are computed by unodc. for additional information, please see the unodc website: https://dataunodc.un.org/sites/dataunodc.un.org/files/metadata_intentional_homicide.pdf.
All 13 values
| Year | Intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 4.33 |
| 2018 | no data |
| 2017 | no data |
| 2016 | no data |
| 2015 | no data |
| 2014 | no data |
| 2013 | no data |
| 2012 | no data |
| 2011 | 2.4 |
| 2010 | 1.8 |
| 2009 |
Intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) in nearby economies
- American Samoa — 25.54 (2018)
- Australia — 0.85 (2023)
- China — 0.5 (2020)
- Fiji — 2.06 (2023)
- Hong Kong SAR, China — 0.38 (2023)
- Japan — 0.23 (2023)
- Korea, Rep. — 0.48 (2023)
- Macao SAR, China — 0.56 (2023)
- Malaysia — 0.73 (2023)
- Mongolia — 5.92 (2023)
More public sector data for Guam
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) — 40 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100) — 25.63 (2024)
Every indicator for Guam is on the Guam data page.
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Guam's intentional homicides (per 100,000 people)?
- 4.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 2000?
- It is up 246.23% from 1.25 in 2000 (6.75% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 6.67 in 2006 and the lowest 0.6 in 2008.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: UNODC Research - Data Portal – Intentional Homicide, UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator VC.IHR.PSRC.P5, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: UNODC Research - Data Portal – Intentional Homicide, UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in