Eswatini: Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2024, Eswatini's discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU) rose 100 on 2023 (from -100 to 0).

Across the 10 yearly changes before that (2014 to 2023), the average change was −10 and a typical year strayed about 73.79 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.5 standard deviations above that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 100 in 2015 and the biggest yearly fall was 100 in 2014. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2015 to 2024 there is no clear straight-line trend: a straight line explains 7% of the movement over 10 observed years, so the value is moving around more than it is heading anywhere.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2024, Eswatini had the 21st highest value of the 37 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Eswatini in the 2024 ranking

• Albania — 21st of 37: 0
• Angola — 22nd of 37: 0
• Bolivia — 23rd of 37: 0
• Japan — 25th of 37: 0
• Panama — 26th of 37: 0
• Fiji — 27th of 37: -100,000

What this measures

Although the SNA ensures there is perfect consistency between the three measures of GDP, this is a conceptual consistency that in general does not emerge naturally from data compilations. This is because of the wide disparity of data sources that must be called on and the fact that any error in any source will lead to a difference between at least two of the GDP measures. In practice it is inevitable that many such data errors will exist and will become apparent in exercises such as the balancing of supply and use tables. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.

All 12 values

Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU) in nearby economies

• Angola — 0 (2024)
• Benin — 0 (2025)
• Botswana — -2.52 billion (2025)
• Burkina Faso — 0 (2025)
• Cabo Verde — -100 (2025)
• Cameroon — 309.25 billion (2025)
• Central African Republic — 495,800 (2025)
• Chad — -1.05 million (2025)
• Comoros — 0 (2025)

More economic policy & debt data for Eswatini

• Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) — US$330.7 million (2025)
• Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU) — 5.92 billion (2025)
• Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP) — 6.41% (2025)
• Gross Value Added (GVA) at basic prices (current US$) — US$4.77 billion (2025)
• Gross Value Added (GVA) at basic prices (current LCU) — 85.32 billion (2025)
• GDP (current US$) — US$5.16 billion (2025)
• GDP (current LCU) — 92.32 billion (2025)
• GDP per capita (current US$) — US$4,108 (2025)
• GDP per capita (current LCU) — 73,492 (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Eswatini's discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)?

0 in 2024, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How does Eswatini rank?

21st highest of 37 economies with data for 2024.

Is the latest change in discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU) unusual for Eswatini?

In 2024, Eswatini's discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU) rose 100 on 2023 (from -100 to 0). Across the 10 yearly changes before that (2014 to 2023), the average change was −10 and a typical year strayed about 73.79 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.5 standard deviations above that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank's World Development Indicators, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks; National Accounts data files, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Staff estimates, World Bank (WB).

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator NY.GDP.DISC.CN, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks; National Accounts data files, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Staff estimates, World Bank (WB) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.