Cuba's binding coverage, all products (%) was 32.59% in 2022, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is up 0.33 percentage points from 32.26% in 2012.
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 32.59% | 2022 |
| Five years earlier | 32.42% | 2017 |
| Ten years earlier | 32.26% | 2012 |
| Highest | 35.36% | 1996 |
| Lowest | 32.26% | 2009 |
| Average since 2013 | 32.48% | 2013–2022 |
| First recorded | 35.36% | 1996 |
What the numbers say
In 2022, Cuba's binding coverage, all products (%) rose 0.01 percentage points on 2021 (from 32.58% to 32.59%).
Across the 21 yearly changes before that (1997 to 2021), the average change was −0.15 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0.48 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.01 percentage points in 2022 and the biggest yearly fall was 1.9 percentage points in 2009. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2013 to 2022 the straight-line trend is upward, about 0.04 percentage points a year. A straight line explains 90% of the movement over 8 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
How it compares
In 2022, Cuba had the 32nd highest value of the 130 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.
Closest to Cuba in the 2022 ranking
- Philippines — 29th of 130: 62.15%
- Mauritania — 30th of 130: 40.6%
- Côte d'Ivoire — 31st of 130: 34.18%
- Suriname — 33rd of 130: 27.45%
- Myanmar — 34th of 130: 18.94%
- Bangladesh — 35th of 130: 17.32%
What this measures
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.
All 25 values
| Year | Binding coverage, all products (%) |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 32.59 |
| 2021 | 32.58 |
| 2020 | 32.58 |
| 2019 | 32.58 |
| 2018 | no data |
| 2017 | 32.42 |
| 2016 | 32.42 |
| 2015 | 32.42 |
| 2014 | no data |
| 2013 | 32.26 |
| 2012 |
Binding coverage, all products (%) in nearby economies
- Antigua and Barbuda — 97.5% (2021)
- Argentina — 99.98% (2022)
- Barbados — 95.84% (2022)
- Belize — 0% (2022)
- Bolivia — 99.98% (2022)
- Brazil — 99.98% (2022)
- Chile — 99.98% (2022)
- Colombia — 99.98% (2022)
- Costa Rica — 0% (2022)
- Dominica — 92.72% (2020)
- Dominican Republic
More trade data for Cuba
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%) — 10.42% (2022)
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, manufactured products (%) — 10.98% (2022)
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%) — 10.06% (2022)
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, manufactured products (%) — 10.98% (2022)
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%) — 10.6% (2022)
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, all products (%) — 10.18% (2022)
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%) — 9.16% (2022)
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, all products (%) — 11.51% (2022)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Cuba's binding coverage, all products (%)?
- 32.59% in 2022, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 1996?
- It is down 2.77 percentage points from 35.36% in 1996. The highest value was 35.36% in 1996 and the lowest 32.26% in 2009.
- How does Cuba rank?
- 32nd highest of 130 economies with data for 2022.
- Is the latest change in binding coverage, all products (%) unusual for Cuba?
- In 2022, Cuba's binding coverage, all products (%) rose 0.01 percentage points on 2021 (from 32.58% to 32.59%). Across the 21 yearly changes before that (1997 to 2021), the average change was −0.15 percentage points and a typical year strayed about 0.48 percentage points from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.3 standard deviations above that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator TM.TAX.MRCH.BC.ZS, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB); World Integrated Trade Solution system (WITS), World Bank (WB); World Trade Organization (WTO) Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in