Belarus: Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)

Key figures

What the numbers say

In 2023, Belarus' nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people) rose 0.09 on 2022 (from 10.73 to 10.82).

Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1993 to 2022), the average change was +0.11 and a typical year strayed about 0.28 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

On record, the biggest yearly rise was 1.37 in 1998 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.37 in 1991. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.

From 2014 to 2023 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.02 a year. A straight line explains 57% of the movement over 10 observed years.

Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.

How it compares

In 2023, Belarus had the 7th highest value of the 65 economies reporting that year. Higher is not always better: for some indicators the lowest value is the one to aim for. See the full ranking.

Closest to Belarus in the 2023 ranking

• Luxembourg — 4th of 65: 13.72
• New Zealand — 5th of 65: 12.3
• Canada — 6th of 65: 11.26
• United Kingdom — 8th of 65: 9.55
• Qatar — 9th of 65: 8.49
• Malta — 10th of 65: 8.24

What this measures

Nurses and midwives include professional nurses, professional midwives, auxiliary nurses, auxiliary midwives, enrolled nurses, enrolled midwives and other associated personnel, such as dental nurses and primary care nurses.

Limitations: The WHO compiles data from household and labor force surveys, censuses, and administrative records. Data comparability is limited by differences in definitions and training of medical personnel varies. In addition, human resources tend to be concentrated in urban areas, so that average densities do not provide a full picture of health personnel available to the entire population.

Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a weighted average.

All 34 values

Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people) in nearby economies

• Albania — 5.82 (2020)
• Andorra — 4.72 (2023)
• Armenia — 4.75 (2022)
• Austria — 11.28 (2022)
• Azerbaijan — 5.58 (2022)
• Belgium — 12.89 (2021)
• Bosnia and Herzegovina — 6.73 (2022)
• Bulgaria — 4.2 (2023)
• Croatia — 8 (2022)
• Cyprus — 3.89 (2022)
• Czechia

More health data for Belarus

• Population ages 00-04, female (% of female population) — 3.56% (2025)
• Population ages 00-04, male (% of male population) — 4.32% (2025)
• Population ages 0-14, female — 700,885 (2025)
• Population ages 0-14, female (% of female population) — 14.44% (2025)
• Population ages 0-14, male — 742,772 (2025)
• Population ages 0-14, male (% of male population) — 17.55% (2025)
• Population ages 0-14, total — 1.44 million (2025)
• Population ages 0-14 (% of total population) — 15.89% (2025)
• Population ages 05-09, female (% of female population) — 5.05% (2025)

Reading data like this

• Where to find free public data, and how to check it before you trust it — 2 min read
• Data analysis examples: 6 worked from one dataset — 3 min read
• Real change or random noise? A plain guide to reading your numbers — 2 min read

Questions people ask

What is Belarus's nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)?

10.82 in 2023, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).

How has it changed since 1990?

It is up 44.34% from 7.5 in 1990 (1.12% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 10.95 in 2015 and the lowest 7.13 in 1991.

How does Belarus rank?

7th highest of 65 economies with data for 2023.

Is the latest change in nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people) unusual for Belarus?

In 2023, Belarus' nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people) rose 0.09 on 2022 (from 10.73 to 10.82). Across the 30 yearly changes before that (1993 to 2022), the average change was +0.11 and a typical year strayed about 0.28 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 0.1 standard deviations below that average, so it was an ordinary year: it sits within the range of normal year-to-year movement.

Source

World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator SH.MED.NUMW.P3, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: Global Health Workforce Statistics, World Health Organization (WHO); Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); Country data Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.

Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.