Arab World's CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) was 2 in 2025, the latest year in the World Bank's World Development Indicators. That is down 20% from 2.5 in 2015 (2.21% a year on average, compounded).
Key figures
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest | 2 | 2025 |
| Five years earlier | 2.25 | 2020 |
| Ten years earlier | 2.5 | 2015 |
| Highest | 2.8 | 2006 |
| Lowest | 2 | 2025 |
| Average since 2016 | 2.27 | 2016–2025 |
| First recorded | 2.7 | 2005 |
What the numbers say
In 2025, Arab World's CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) fell 0.17 on 2024 (from 2.17 to 2).
Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was −0.03 and a typical year strayed about 0.09 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.5 standard deviations below that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.
On record, the biggest yearly rise was 0.2 in 2011 and the biggest yearly fall was 0.2 in 2012. The numbers show how large and when, not why; for the cause, look at what happened in that country in those years.
From 2016 to 2025 the straight-line trend is downward, about 0.04 a year. A straight line explains 83% of the movement over 10 observed years.
Worked out from the yearly values above. How the checks work: standard deviation, z-scores and straight-line trends.
A straight-line projection, tested first
Extending that straight line gives about 1.95 for 2028. We show this only because the same method, fitted on earlier years, predicted 2023 to 2025 better than "no change" would have: its average miss was 0.07, against 0.11 for assuming no change. Treat it as a continuation of the recent pattern, not a forecast of events: it cannot see a recession, a policy change or a revision to the data.
See how a linear trend forecast works and the guide on forecasting without fooling yourself.
How it compares
See how every economy compares in the full ranking.
| Value | Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Arab World | 2 | 2025 |
| World | 2.81 | 2025 |
What this measures
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.
Limitations: The CPIA exercise is intended to capture the quality of a country's policies and institutional arrangements, focusing on key elements that are within the country's control, rather than on outcomes (such as economic growth rates) that are influenced by events beyond the country's control. More specifically, the CPIA measures the extent to which a country's policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction and, consequently, the effective use of development assistance.
Regional and income-group figures are computed by the World Bank as a unweighted average.
All 21 values
| Year | CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 |
| 2024 | 2.17 |
| 2023 | 2.25 |
| 2022 | 2.25 |
| 2021 | 2.25 |
| 2020 | 2.25 |
| 2019 | 2.33 |
| 2018 | 2.4 |
| 2017 | 2.33 |
| 2016 | 2.5 |
| 2015 |
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) in nearby economies
- Afghanistan — 1.5 (2025)
- Djibouti — 3 (2025)
- Pakistan — 3.5 (2025)
- Yemen, Rep. — 1.5 (2025)
More public sector data for Arab World
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values) — 6.63 billion (2025)
- Military expenditure (current USD) — 144.84 billion (2025)
- Military expenditure (% of GDP) — 5.06% (2025)
- Armed forces personnel, total — 3.07 million (2020)
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force) — 2.33% (2020)
- Military expenditure (% of general government expenditure) — 20.89% (2025)
- CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) — 2.43 (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high) — 2 (2025)
- CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) — 2.43 (2025)
Reading data like this
Questions people ask
- What is Arab World's CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)?
- 2 in 2025, according to the World Bank (World Development Indicators).
- How has it changed since 2005?
- It is down 25.93% from 2.7 in 2005 (1.49% a year on average, compounded). The highest value was 2.8 in 2006 and the lowest 2 in 2025.
- Is the latest change in CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) unusual for Arab World?
- In 2025, Arab World's CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) fell 0.17 on 2024 (from 2.17 to 2). Across the 19 yearly changes before that (2006 to 2024), the average change was −0.03 and a typical year strayed about 0.09 from that (the standard deviation). This year's change was 1.5 standard deviations below that average, so it was larger than a typical year, though not out of the range seen before.
Source
World Bank, World Development Indicators, indicator IQ.CPA.FINS.XQ, licensed CC BY 4.0. Original source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), uri: http://www.worldbank.org/ida Figures are fetched from the World Bank API and refreshed monthly; see the series on data.worldbank.org. The full definition and method are in the World Bank's metadata glossary. Comparisons use the same World Bank release.
Want to ask your own questions of data like this? Try AnalyzeIt: upload a file or ask about public data in plain words, and every figure comes with its working.
Legal entity
Devansh Yadav
Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Governing law: Courts at Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
Phone: +91 8433475698
Legal: legal@analyzeit.in